48 occupied territories abdallah ghifat BDS BDS-SA boycott divestment and sanctions Gaza Human Dignity Israeli Apartheid Week Jerusalem Latest legitimacy muna alkurd Oslo Accords Palestine palestinian solidarity palestinian youth movement pym ramah awad Refugees second intifada South Africa transnational organising West Bank

Palestinian young people are trying to create their own future

Palestinian young people are trying to create their own future

Palestinian young people are going to revive the worldwide Palestinian freedom venture. Between April 1 and April 11, a lot of Palestinian young people from everywhere in the world met in Johannesburg to talk about Palestinian battles and progress. They came collectively underneath the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM), a world movement of young Palestinians

. and industrial sociology scholar Abdallah Ghifat, at present learning in Cape City. Awad, Alkurk and Ghifat sat with SHAAZIA EBRAHIM and FATIMA MOOSA to speak concerning the Palestinian delegation and the future.

What is the Palestinian Youth Motion and what was the aim of the delegation to South Africa?

Ramah Awad: The Palestinian youth motion has an extended history of organizing a world assembly and organizing Palestinian youth. This challenge had needed to revive such a world commitment whereas seeing how the BDS motion has gained a lot momentum, seeing how the apartheid framework has been used as the idea for BDS for Palestine.

Delegation of the Palestinian Youth Motion (PYM) in 2019 to South Africa.

Combining this transnational association with this need for a deeper understanding of South Africa, we decided to convey collectively 20 Palestinian youth from everywhere in the world. Many reside or work abroad, but most of them have just arrived from Gaza, the West Financial institution or refugee camps in Syria or Lebanon. We now have a wide range of Palestinian experiences. It was actually necessary for us to participate and talk about the circumstances of the present national wrestle. This was carried out within the context of South Africa's apartheid wrestle, each traditionally and on current issues

What has the delegation to date been like? Do you see similarities within the South African state of affairs and in the Palestinian context?

Egg Alkurd: I feel it's fascinating. I came from a imaginative and prescient of South Africa and it changed utterly once I came right here. I'm really completely happy and excited, but probably the most exciting level had a gathering with Palestinian youth from everywhere in the world.

Abdallah Ghifat: I lived in Cape City for the last 5 or 6 years. I perceive South Africa in a certain means. I studied politics and sociology and the historical past of South Africa emphasized, struggles, buildings and I have to work together with the South Africans. I was excited to hear the views of other Palestinians all over the world and the way they see South Africa. It tells us how we’d like to cooperate with each other and what we’d like to study from South Africa's errors: the past, the transition process and even the present. This expertise is unique as a result of it is rather rare to convey the Palestinians into a politically impartial state that isn’t affiliated with any political group in an attempt to influence us in a specific path.

Awad: Who we’ve got in the group represents many various backgrounds. We’ve got totally different ideologies, totally different spiritual backgrounds, totally different class struggles, people from totally different native areas, and totally different elements of how Zionism works globally. Nonetheless, we now have so much in widespread in this transition, Palestinian id and nationalism. Every time I'm in a state where there are so many Palestinians, it mechanically seems like house.

What do you consider the connection between South Africa and Palestine and how can it’s stronger?

Awad: From what I've gathered, BDS South Africa could be very robust. I gathered that there is a historical past of solidarity with Palestine. It begins with ANC training with Palestine, there’s a long widespread battle.

Ghifat: As Palestinians, once we meet with South African groups, we say that people have totally different ideas about Palestine than the Palestinian Federation, for instance. We are very crucial to PA. As an alternative of the Palestinian people, PAs, corresponding to Leaders, led Bantustansia through the apartheid, who have been representatives of the government of apartheid and proxy. In our case, it is the government of Israel.

Awad: At a sensible degree, it’s a question of how politically lively South Africans can actually give a brand new era of management. Plainly PA is crucial supply or reference point for SA, which is an issue for me as a result of they came out of the Israeli undertaking. It does not lead us to liberation. I hope South Africa sees this and provides us area and assets to construct an actual nationwide movement.

What is the current state of the Palestinian liberation venture?

Awad: PYM got here after the Oslo Agreements after one other Intifada (another Palestinian rebellion towards Israel). It came the place we felt that the nationwide, international liberation venture and movement have been collapsing. For us as Palestinians, it is necessary that we revive the nationwide liberation venture. It appears to be a query mark, but we would not have a real national launch. What we’ve got is half, barely a sovereign nationwide authorities, which, for those who ask probably the most Palestinians, actually does not characterize their interests.

Ghifat: We have now a leadership crisis in Palestine. As we’ve discussed, youth buildings are unanimous that we have now weak leadership and that we’d like to form a new leadership part. Such packages may help create a brand new era of management. Networking and sharing experiences helps us build a consensus on what we would like as Palestinians for the future, for our liberation.

What would you like South Africans to know concerning the Palestinian management crisis?

Ghifat: It will be useful if the South African authorities might help by means of its rich expertise, not simply the federal government, however the NGOs. If they assist us to work in, for instance, PLO buildings. We are not quite towards the PLO, which represented the interests of the Palestinian people more. Nevertheless, we’ve to distinguish between PLO and PA, which are fairly totally different.

What does the international BDS movement imply for the discharge of the Palestinians?

Ghifat: As a Palestinian, referring to BDS, we mean a broader BDS movement that includes all of the totally different Palestinian solidarity actions that belong to it.

Awad: In view of the collapse of the Palestinian Authority and different populist buildings, we have now seen the rise of the BDS motion as crucial means of getting people. That is mainly due to solidarity and assets, regardless of the world, to isolate Israel additional by means of boycotts, sales, sanctions. It's an important job. Typically I feel that is the final line, given the regional and worldwide dynamics. Had it not been for BDS, there can be no mechanism by which Israel abstains.

What’s missing is the shortage of cohesion, organization and nationwide technique of the Palestinians. I consider that that is due to the collapse of the commerce unions and the establishments and well-liked committees all over the world. There has been nothing after the Oslo Agreements to revive it. We’d like BDS to put strain on Israel, but the question of leadership on the desk could be very worrying. BDS is essential, however we have now to build alongside the nationwide movement.

Ghifat: One of many issues that perceives Palestine is that we should not have a single voice to control the BDS. I encourage all the totally different movements to concentrate on Palestine and pay attention to the totally different voices of Palestine, not those who are trying to get a monopoly on Palestinian voices or on our supposed representatives of all who haven’t any legitimacy. We now have to question this idea of ​​legitimacy and the place it comes from.

What would you like to obtain from this go to?

Awad: I feel crucial learning points for me are the interior action and the processes that create the mass movement, the armed wrestle and the questions of how South Africa came to the Fact and Reconciliation Council. There are so many alignments and classes for studying. I really like to come out with a short-term technique, a medium-term technique and a long-term strategy. In the brief term, we are saying to participate and study from South Africa and apply these classes the place you arrange. We would like to see this as an educational experience. In the long run, I would like to take into consideration revitalizing the worldwide aspect. It’s the middle part that I feel we will do more. We’d like to take into consideration what Palestine needs and how we will be a part of it.

What sort of path do you look forward to?

Ghifat: There are two totally different opinions about our discussions. We attempt to study once we go, the place we should always go. All of us agree that Palestinianism is part of the Palestinian Sea of ​​the River, and in the Palestinians, all of us agree that we reside in a social democratic state without discrimination.

We are still discussing, and many people disagree with South Africa concerning the fate of our colonizers – we wish to reside with them as a result of South Africans don’t or don’t need to. We advised people that we met that your leadership was not just a failure, but failed us as Palestinians to give us a great example of how mediation is negotiated. Now we are very reluctant to put strain on the answer in the identical method as South Africa. We’d like to understand the logic of the expertise of a negotiated answer.

Are you able to increase extra with what to do with "colonizers"?

Anchor: The topic of the inhabitants and what our colonizers do – it is necessary to notice that we come from very totally different locations and experiences. I can't imagine dwelling with a resident who shops my house and now lives there. Once I see settlers, they are my enemies. I don't see them as a neighbor. But maybe other Palestinians can see settlers and Israelis as people who can reside with us and could be a peaceful nation. For people coming to me and particularly to the West Bank, we can’t imagine settlers as neighbors and associates.

Ghifat: He's not talking a few metaphorical point. Residents reside in their own home. Her grandmother's home and her father's house are subsequent to one another. Residents took their father's house. She is pressured to reside together with her grandmother. They’ve to go through the identical gate. They go through the left aspect where his grandmother's home is, and the resident moves to the proper the place his father's home is. They will't imagine the residents dwelling collectively.

I personally have a long-term vision the place I see that we might have to make some compromises. I come from a selected area – 48 to the occupied territories – which we actually confuse the Israelis. It is a totally different experience during which we typically interact with repressors. It's virtually like a relationship will normalize, however not normal. There could also be a room the place we will understand dwelling. Perhaps somebody who has extra influence – I'm unsure we will measure it – they blocked their minds and stated we couldn't stay on their oppressors.

We're trying to resolve these discussions.

Image of a Palestinian youth motion